[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":38},["ShallowReactive",2],{"post-court-findings-pattern-paul-pontings-56640-in-legal-costs-and-permanent-injunctions":3},{"id":4,"type":5,"slug":6,"title":7,"content":8,"excerpt":9,"featuredImage":10,"publishedAt":11,"createdAt":11,"updatedAt":12,"categories":13,"tags":18,"seo":10},14,"post","court-findings-pattern-paul-pontings-56640-in-legal-costs-and-permanent-injunctions","Court Findings Pattern: Paul Ponting's £56,640 in Legal Costs and Permanent Injunctions","\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>CONTENT:\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>Public court records documented by journalist Neil Wilby reveal pattern of civil court findings against Paul Arthur Ponting, 54, of Ormskirk, resulting in permanent injunctions and substantial legal costs exceeding £56,000.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>All Information:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Public court records, civil court judgments, reporting by Neil Wilby\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Financial Impact: Legal Costs Analysis\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">1. Lancashire Constabulary Civil Injunction (March 2020)\u003C\u002Fh3>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Case:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Lancashire Police v. Ponting\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Court:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Civil proceedings under Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, 2014\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Outcome:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Permanent injunction granted to Lancashire Constabulary\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Costs Ordered:\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list -->\n\u003Cul class=\"wp-block-list\">\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Lancashire Police costs:\u003C\u002Fstrong> £30,000\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Ponting's own costs:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Estimated £5,000-£10,000\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Total:\u003C\u002Fstrong> £35,000-£40,000\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Injunction Terms:\u003C\u002Fstrong> According to court records, order places \"considerable restrictions\" on Ponting's contact with Lancashire officers, either online or in person.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Significance:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Police force successfully obtained permanent court order restricting individual's behavior toward officers.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">2. Two Lawyers Civil Claim (April 2024)\u003C\u002Fh3>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Case:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Two Greater Manchester lawyers v. Ponting\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Court:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Civil stalking and harassment claim\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Outcome:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Ponting lost case\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Costs and Damages:\u003C\u002Fstrong> £26,640 \u003Cstrong>Injunction:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Permanent \"until further order\" injunction imposed\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Significance:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Two legal professionals successfully sued Ponting for stalking and harassment. Permanent injunction suggests court found ongoing risk requiring indefinite restrictions.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Total Financial Impact\u003C\u002Fh3>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Minimum costs:\u003C\u002Fstrong> £56,640 in legally ordered payments\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Maximum costs:\u003C\u002Fstrong> £66,640 (including Ponting's own legal costs in Lancashire case)\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Additional:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Legal costs for defending charges, representing self in proceedings\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Pattern:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Substantial financial consequences resulting from court findings regarding Ponting's behavior toward others.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Permanent Injunctions\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Injunction 1: Lancashire Constabulary Order (2020)\u003C\u002Fh3>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Nature:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Permanent civil injunction\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Basis:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, 2014\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Restrictions:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Limits contact with Lancashire police officers online and in person\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Duration:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Permanent (no expiration date)\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Context:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Police force sought and obtained court order restricting individual's behavior. Civil injunction indicates pattern of conduct requiring legal intervention beyond criminal system.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Injunction 2: Two Lawyers Order (2024)\u003C\u002Fh3>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Nature:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Permanent \"until further order\" injunction\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Basis:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Civil stalking and harassment findings\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Restrictions:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Not publicly detailed (standard practice in harassment injunctions)\u003Cbr>\u003Cstrong>Duration:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Indefinite (until court determines otherwise)\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Context:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Legal professionals obtained protection order. \"Until further order\" language suggests court determined ongoing risk requiring indefinite restrictions.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Judge's Assessment: \"Practiced and Determined Liar\"\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>According to Neil Wilby's reporting on court documents:\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Quote:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Circuit judge in civil proceedings referred to Paul Ponting as \"practiced and determined liar in almost every aspect of his life\"\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Significance:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Judicial finding regarding credibility. Judges don't use such language lightly. Suggests pattern of dishonesty presented to court requiring explicit judicial comment.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Impact:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Credibility finding by circuit judge becomes part of public record. Future proceedings may reference judicial assessment of truthfulness.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Pattern Analysis: Multiple Courts, Multiple Years\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3} -->\n\u003Ch3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Timeline of Court Involvement:\u003C\u002Fh3>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>March 2020:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Lancashire Police obtain permanent injunction, £30,000 costs\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>March 2023:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Arrested by Greater Manchester Police on stalking\u002Fharassment\u002Fassault allegations\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>April 2024:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Loses civil case to two lawyers, £26,640 costs, permanent injunction\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>May 2024:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Charged with stalking with fear of violence (Section 4)\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>June 2025:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Trial scheduled Preston Crown Court\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Pattern Identified:\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list -->\n\u003Cul class=\"wp-block-list\">\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Multiple courts (civil and criminal jurisdictions)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Multiple years (2020-2025)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Multiple complainants (police force, lawyers, female complainant in criminal case)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Multiple findings requiring judicial intervention\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Escalating severity (civil injunctions → criminal charges)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Accountability Irony\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Ponting's Public Position:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Operates \"UK Corrupt Police\" website. Positions self as accountability campaigner exposing police corruption.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Court Reality:\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list -->\n\u003Cul class=\"wp-block-list\">\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Police force obtained permanent injunction against him\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Called \"practiced and determined liar\" by judge\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>£56,640+ in legal costs ordered\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Multiple courts found behavior requiring restriction\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Now facing criminal trial for stalking\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>The Disconnect:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Individual claiming to hold others accountable repeatedly found by courts to require legal restrictions on own behavior.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Social Media Suspensions\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>Beyond court findings, Ponting's accounts suspended by platforms:\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Twitter\u002FX:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Account suspended according to Neil Wilby reporting. Platform found privacy breaches and abuse violations per May 30, 2023 findings.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>WhatDoTheyKnow:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Freedom of Information request platform suspended Ponting's account stating \"You have repeatedly misused our service.\"\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Pattern:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Even platforms designed for accountability and transparency found Ponting's behavior crossed lines requiring account suspension.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Current Obligations\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>As of October 2025, Ponting subject to:\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list {\"ordered\":true} -->\n\u003Col class=\"wp-block-list\">\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Two permanent civil injunctions\u003C\u002Fstrong> restricting behavior\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Criminal bail conditions\u003C\u002Fstrong> including no contact with complainant and no social media posting about complainant\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>£56,640 minimum\u003C\u002Fstrong> in court-ordered costs and damages\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>\u003Cstrong>Pending criminal trial\u003C\u002Fstrong> June 2025 on serious charges\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\u003C\u002Fol>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Public Interest Considerations\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Why Document This?\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Accountability:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Individual operating websites claiming to expose others' conduct has own conduct repeatedly requiring court intervention.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Pattern Recognition:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Multiple courts across multiple years making similar findings suggests systematic issue rather than isolated incidents.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Financial Consequences:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Over £56,000 in legal costs demonstrates real consequences for behavior courts found problematic.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Judicial Assessment:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Circuit judge's description of Ponting as \"practiced and determined liar\" is unusually direct judicial language warranting public awareness.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Ongoing Proceedings:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Criminal trial pending. Public entitled to know about charges and previous court findings.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Legal Protections for This Article\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Public Record:\u003C\u002Fstrong> All court proceedings, judgments, and orders are matters of public record\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Legitimate Journalism:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Information from investigative journalist Neil Wilby's documented court reporting\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Factual Reporting:\u003C\u002Fstrong> No opinions or allegations. Simple documentation of court findings and judicial statements.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Public Interest:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Courts have determined individual's behavior warrants restrictions. Public interest in understanding pattern of judicial findings.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Protected Speech:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Reporting on court proceedings and judicial findings fully protected under UK law.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:heading -->\n\u003Ch2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Sources\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:heading -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list -->\n\u003Cul class=\"wp-block-list\">\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Neil Wilby investigative journalism (neilwilby.com)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Lancashire Constabulary civil court proceedings (March 2020)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Civil court judgment re: two lawyers (April 2024)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Preston Crown Court proceedings (ongoing)\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, 2014\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Protection from Harassment Act, 1997\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:list-item -->\n\u003Cli>Public court records and judgments\u003C\u002Fli>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list-item -->\u003C\u002Ful>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:list -->\n\n\u003C!-- wp:paragraph -->\n\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Paul Ponting cannot DMCA this article:\u003C\u002Fstrong> Factual reporting on public court records. All information from documented judicial proceedings and legitimate journalism. Fully protected speech.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003C!-- \u002Fwp:paragraph -->","Analysis of public court records shows Paul Ponting subject to at least two permanent injunctions and ordered to pay over £56,000 in legal costs across multiple civil proceedings. Circuit judge called him \"practiced and determined liar.\"",null,"2025-10-03T00:22:23.000Z","2026-01-03T10:00:25.669Z",[14],{"id":15,"name":16,"slug":17},2,"The Anxious Ormskirk Troll:","the-anxious-ormskirk-troll",[19,22,26,30,34],{"id":15,"name":20,"slug":21},"Paul Ponting","paul-ponting",{"id":23,"name":24,"slug":25},24,"Injunctions","injunctions",{"id":27,"name":28,"slug":29},25,"Legal Costs","legal-costs",{"id":31,"name":32,"slug":33},26,"Civil Courts","civil-courts",{"id":35,"name":36,"slug":37},27,"Harassment Findings","harassment-findings",1788255875152]